Search for: "YOUTUBE, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2024, 10:00 am by Eric Goldman
To get around this, the plaintiffs cited the In re Zoom opinion involving Zoom’s liability for Zoombombing. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:31 am by Aaron Rubin and Leanne Ta
The court first held that Lewis could not show damages due to the fact that the YouTube Terms of Service contained a limitation of liability provision that disclaimed liability for any omissions relating to content. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:31 am by Aaron Rubin and Leanne Ta
The court first held that Lewis could not show damages due to the fact that the YouTube Terms of Service contained a limitation of liability provision that disclaimed liability for any omissions relating to content. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:11 pm by Eric Goldman
” To the contrary, the CDA expressly protects internet companies from such liability. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 2:11 am by Florian Mueller
""YouTube, LLC ('YouTube') is wholly owned by Google and is a Delaware limited liability company with a physical address at 3600 Presidential Boulevard, Austin, Texas 78719. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 5:31 am by Etta Lanum
District Court for the Northern District of California, seeking to hold social media companies liable for their deaths under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) and the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA). [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
July 3, 2023, contested) The SEC brought and settled claims against a California-based window manufacturer for allegedly failing to disclose approximately $28 million in expected warranty-related liabilities. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 10:22 am by INFORRM
The petitioners allege that Google (which owns YouTube) aided ISIS’s recruitment by recommending ISIS videos through YouTube’s algorithms. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:50 am by Adrian Lurssen
These companies, in violation of Facebook code, were sharing user identifiers with other companies. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 1:14 pm by Scott Bomboy
But in the Taamneh case, the Ninth Circuit decided that the three companies faced liability for aiding-and-abetting under Section 2333 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, reversing a lower court decision. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 4:00 am
– SABIP report ‘Changing Attitudes & Behaviours in the ‘Non-Internet’ Digital World and their Implications for Intellectual Property’ (IPKat) (1709 Copyright Blog)   United States US General United States moves to promote internet freedom, ‘knowledge commons’, response to google.cn controversy (IP Watch) (China Hearsay) (China Hearsay)   US General – Lawsuits and strategic steps Microsoft - Lawsuit accusing Microsoft of misleading… [read post]